Fallout and miss in journal peer review

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fallout and miss in journal peer review

Purpose – The authors exploit the analogy between journal peer review and information retrieval in order to quantify some imperfections of journal peer review. Design/methodology/approach – The authors define fallout rate and missing rate in order to describe quantitatively the weak papers that were accepted and the strong papers that were missed, respectively. To assess the quality of manuscri...

متن کامل

Medical journal peer review: process and bias.

Scientific peer review is pivotal in health care research in that it facilitates the evaluation of findings for competence, significance, and originality by qualified experts. While the origins of peer review can be traced to the societies of the eighteenth century, it became an institutionalized part of the scholarly process in the latter half of the twentieth century. This was a response to t...

متن کامل

4 : The effectiveness of journal peer review

Peer reviewed journals throughout the world have adopted similar review practices in an effort to select the best among submitted manuscripts and to improve their quality before publication. These practices have been justified mainly by tradition and argument. Considering the high stakes of publication, peer review practices should be supported by scientific evidence that they improve outcomes ...

متن کامل

Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal

Peer review is widely used system for evaluating manuscripts prior to publication. It has been and still is widely used tool for making justified and fair editorial decision. However, the evidence of its efficacy is limited and it has been criticized to be time-consuming, biased, inconsistent, conservative, and open to abuse. As a result, researchers, editors and policymakers have questioned it...

متن کامل

The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal

UNLABELLED All the opinions in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed to reflect, in any way, those of the Department of Veterans Affairs. BACKGROUND Our study purpose was to assess the predictive validity of reviewer quality ratings and editorial decisions in a general medicine journal. METHODS Submissions to the Journal of General Internal Medicine (JGIM) betwee...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Documentation

سال: 2013

ISSN: 0022-0418

DOI: 10.1108/jd-12-2011-0053